[Chandler-dev] Yet another proposal for Chandler plugins

[Ted Leung]

On Feb 13, 2007, at 4:57 PM, Phillip J. Eby wrote:

> At 04:33 PM 2/13/2007 -0800, Ted Leung wrote:
>> So while README's are good,
>> they aren't nearly enough.
>
> Yes, I'm just saying that this doesn't seem to me to interfere or  
> compete with Andi's proposal.  Andi has uses for the functionality  
> and the willingness+ability to develop it -- which is not really  
> the case for what you're proposing, IIUC.
>
> At least having README's and buildable plugins goes a good way  
> towards having examples that others can tinker with.  Improved  
> ability to tinker (e.g. the menu proposal) is also helpful.   
> Arguably, good tinkering support is at least as important as  
> reference documentation and tutorials, which we already have  
> several of.
>
> Obviously, all documentation can always be improved, but in terms  
> of rounding out what we have, Andi's proposal does help to fill out  
> one of the weaker spots.

Andi solicited feedback on his proposal and I gave it.  If you guys  
want to ignore it, that's your perogative.

Ted