[Chandler-dev] Yet another proposal for Chandler plugins

[Phillip J. Eby]

At 04:33 PM 2/13/2007 -0800, Ted Leung wrote:
>So while README's are good,
>they aren't nearly enough.

Yes, I'm just saying that this doesn't seem to me to interfere or compete 
with Andi's proposal.  Andi has uses for the functionality and the 
willingness+ability to develop it -- which is not really the case for what 
you're proposing, IIUC.

At least having README's and buildable plugins goes a good way towards 
having examples that others can tinker with.  Improved ability to tinker 
(e.g. the menu proposal) is also helpful.  Arguably, good tinkering support 
is at least as important as reference documentation and tutorials, which we 
already have several of.

Obviously, all documentation can always be improved, but in terms of 
rounding out what we have, Andi's proposal does help to fill out one of the 
weaker spots.