[Chandler-dev] Alpha4 debug and stabilization

[Katie Capps Parlante]

In other words, yes, running the continuous builds to test/dogfood 
Chandler will be useful and likely be just as stable as the checkpoint 
builds.

If you do file bug reports, be sure to note the svn revision #.

Cheers,
Katie

Heikki Toivonen wrote:
> Davor Cubranic wrote:
>> Isn't the continuous build == trunk?
> 
> Yes. Checkpoint builds are also normally done from the trunk on Monday
> mornings. We have QA run tests on them and they post the test results
> normally by Tuesday. From that test report you can tell if the
> checkpoint build is usable or not. There are no quarantees that the
> checkpoint build is any better than continuous builds, but the QA test
> report will give an indication how good the checkpoint build is.
> 
> We haven't branched for alpha4 yet.