[Chandler-dev] Sane defaults for new Chandler testing framework

[John Anderson]

+1

Bryan Stearns wrote:
> Just curious: why aren't we using python's logging for tests? We're 
> already using it for the rest of the app, and it's got easily 
> overridable defaults, levels, alternative streams of output (which 
> could be used for the minimal output that tbox needs to detect 
> failures)...
>
> ...Bryan
>
> Mikeal Rogers wrote:
>
>> Bear hasn't gotten back to me yet on exactly what he would like for 
>> a  format on tinderbox.
>>
>> The default we have for human use shouldn't necessarily be the same  
>> as tinderbox. When bear integrated the functional test tool I wrote  
>> for cosmo I believe he masked all output and just read the final  
>> summary output.
>>
>> It's trivial to have different output setting on tinderbox and  
>> regular human use.
>>
>> -Mikeal
>>
>>
>> On May 23, 2006, at 4:03 PM, Andi Vajda wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, 23 May 2006, Mikeal Rogers wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hiya,
>>>
>>>
>>>> All of these can be easily set manually, but the question we have  
>>>> is "what should the defaults be when running individual tests and  
>>>> the functional test suite?".
>>>
>>>
>>> The defaults should be whatever is used by the tinderboxes.
>>>
>>> Andi..
>>>
>>
>> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>>
>> Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
>> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
>
>
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>
> Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev