[Dev] Re: [Cosmo] Apple iCal & cosmo-demo
morgen at osafoundation.org
Mon Mar 6 12:17:59 PST 2006
I don't think Chandler should assume that there will be a port 80
('http') server along with the port 443 ('https') server, and that
they both refer to the same Cosmo instance. I'm not sure how
Chandler could know this in a general way, without having site-
specific logic (in other words, "if host == 'cosmo-demo' then port
443 is equivalent to 80") inside Chandler. It's perhaps unusual that
cosmo-demo is set up this way, and I wouldn't count on it. I would
be interested to hear what other people think.
On Mar 6, 2006, at 11:59 AM, Mimi Yin wrote:
> So it seems like we do need to spit out a separate URL for iCal
> users? Morgen?
> On Mar 6, 2006, at 10:41 AM, Priscilla Chung wrote:
>> Yup. Me too. So I deleted the 'S' in HTTPS and it worked. -Priscilla
>> On Mar 3, 2006, at 12:21 PM, Mimi Yin wrote:
>>> I had trouble too.
>>> On Mar 2, 2006, at 1:59 PM, Morgen Sagen wrote:
>>>> I just discovered that Apple iCal doesn't support HTTPS, which
>>>> means it won't work with our https://cosmo-
>>>> demo.osafoundation.org/ server. I guess when we tested this
>>>> earlier we weren't using HTTPS (or else iCal stopped supporting
>>>> HTTPS). Is this something we should address? It's a shame to
>>>> go through all this work to allow non-Chandler clients to
>>>> interoperate with us, and then have it not work.
More information about the Dev