[Dev] Last call: bugzilla components proposal

[Katie Capps Parlante]

+1

Thanks for putting this together Heikki. Sounds good to me, lets go 
ahead and do it. I realize we haven't resolved the documentation 
bugs/tasks issue, but I think we can go ahead and make the other changes 
while we are working that out.

Cheers,
Katie

Heikki Toivonen wrote:
> Philippe Bossut wrote:
>> Glad to see we're having this discussion so. I think we can converge soon.
> 
> We continued this discussion on IRC today. I'll summarize the current
> thinking. The wiki page has also been updated at
> http://wiki.osafoundation.org/bin/view/Projects/BugzillaComponentsZeroPointSeven
> 
> Accounts to stay as Accounts (like more general better)
> 
> Calendar: Minicalendar to stay because minipreview sounds weird and we
> already talk about minicalendar. Component desc to make clear it also
> means the preview area.
> 
> CPIA to stay as CPIA. It is cryptic, but so was the alternative
> suggestion. It is unlikely end users will ever file bugs into this
> component, regardless of what it is called. We already call this CPIA.
> We can reassign bugs as necessary.
> 
> Documentation: CSG/Web still unclear.
> 
> Examples will cover repository viewer and all the other examples. We can
> split subcomponents for amazon etc. if needed. NOTE: I realized the
> owner is not clear. Is it capps or morgen?
> 
> PKI to Security Service. This implies there is Security UI missing, but
> at the moment we are not paying any attention to this, so hence no
> Security UI component yet.
> 
> No PDA Sync until we get someone to work on code.
> 
> Zanshin is to be its own product.
> 
> All the server-like things in Chandler are to be covered under Servlets
> component.
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
> 
> Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev