[Chandler-dev] performance tests

[Heikki Toivonen]

Katie Capps Parlante wrote:
> Heikki Toivonen wrote:
>> Is mail syncing also something you use and which is slowing you down?
> 
> Do we have a test for this? I don't think this is on our Alpha3/Alpha4
> short list, but is probably good to have in our repertoire.

No test yet. I'd like to hear word first if anyone who uses this finds
this a problem. Even then, I think this would be something we'd work on
after alpha4.

> - Running too many tests in every cycle means the cycle takes forever
> 
> What are our options here?
> - Does it make sense to have different test suites, and not run all test
> suites continuously? Or alternate test suite runs?

I am happy with the time it currently takes to run the tests. PPC Mac is
just under an hour, while Windows and Linux are significantly faster.
I'd like to keep the slowest platform at an hour or less if possible.

A good thing about making performance improvements is that the faster
Chandler gets the more tests we can do in an hour ;)

-- 
  Heikki Toivonen


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 251 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/chandler-dev/attachments/20060616/85775383/signature.pgp