[Chandler-dev] Re: [Design] Performance issues to concentrate on in alpha3?

Ted Leung twl at osafoundation.org
Thu Jun 8 17:48:04 PDT 2006


On Jun 8, 2006, at 5:06 PM, John Anderson wrote:

> I think some of these things are slow only the first time you do  
> the task -- and should be fast from then on -- even if you rerun  
> Chandler. So in the life of a normal Chandler user, that doesn't  
> always start with a fresh repository, the slow situations are  
> extremely rare:
>
> + Switching between calendars
> + Activating/Deactivation calendars using checkboxes
> + Changing the view - going week to week or clicking on mini cal to  
> go to a particular week

I do all of these things on a regular basis.  I have 5 calendars in  
my sidebar and I definitely switch between them.  Sometimes I need to  
add an event to the office calendar, other times to my personal work  
calendar.   I am switching calendars a lot.

With 5 calendars in the sidebar,  The screen is often over full with  
events -- even though I am running on large (1920 x 1440) monitor  
with an enlarged Chandler window -- so I am often activating and  
deactivating calendars using the checkboxes.

I also change the view regularly because the meetings are a week or  
two ahead of today's date.

In short, all three of these situations happen regularly for me.  And  
they happen after I rerun Chandler, and they happen the second,  
third, and 10th time that I do them.

Additionally, double clicking to create an event is very slow, and I  
frequently find that I have created two events because I thought that  
the mouse didn't click or something like that.

I also find the the performance of syncinng (no surprise) is a  
usability barrier.

This is all from my experience with the Intel Mac build.

Ted

>
> Sheila Mooney wrote:
>> I have been dogfooding Chandler for a while. Looking at the  
>> complete list of performance scenarios...
>>
>> http://wiki.osafoundation.org/bin/view/Journal/ 
>> CalendarDogfoodPerformanceScenarios
>>
>> The top 5 items that I find the most bothersome are...
>>
>> + Switching between calendars
>> + Activating/Deactivation calendars using checkboxes
>> + Double clicking to create a new event
>> + Stamping events as a communication
>> + Changing the view - going week to week or clicking on mini cal  
>> to go to a particular week
>>
>> Sheila
>>
>> On Jun 5, 2006, at 12:14 PM, Heikki Toivonen wrote:
>>
>>> We've set performance improvements as a big item for alpha3, but  
>>> one of
>>> the problems we are facing is that we don't have the performance  
>>> tests
>>> (yet) for the new use cases we are interested in. (I'll be  
>>> working on
>>> these this week, now that we seem to have gotten the Tinderbox perf
>>> tests stable again.)
>>>
>>> So, I would like you to respond to this message to let us know  
>>> what the
>>> biggest performance issues are that are bothering you when you  
>>> are using
>>> Chandler.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> -- 
>>>   Heikki Toivonen
>>>
>>>
>>> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>>>
>>> Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
>>> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
>> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>>
>> Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
>> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design
>>
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>
> Open Source Applications Foundation "Design" mailing list
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/design

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/chandler-dev/attachments/20060608/0384bc17/attachment.html


More information about the chandler-dev mailing list