[Chandler-dev] Checking background sync into the trunk [Poll]
Morgen Sagen
morgen at osafoundation.org
Wed Jun 7 13:29:46 PDT 2006
Good point -- sharing of already-stamped items works fine. It's only
a problem if an already-shared item is then stamped and synced. I
won't land bgsync until I have made sure that running into this
problem at least fails gracefully.
On Jun 7, 2006, at 1:25 PM, Philippe Bossut wrote:
> I understand that "stamping of shared items" won't work but will
> "sharing of stamped items" will? I do have quite a bit of those
> and, if I can't use sync for a while because of that, I'd like to
> know.
>
> BTW, the office shared calendar does contain events that are
> stamped as email (done when sending invites). Does this means we
> won't be able to sync the Office calendar?
>
> Cheers,
> - Philippe
>
> Morgen Sagen wrote:
>>
>> On Jun 6, 2006, at 5:31 PM, Katie Capps Parlante wrote:
>>
>>> I'm in favor of #1
>>> + background sync is currently our highest priority for alpha3
>>> + we've found so far that finding the bugs and making
>>> reproducible test cases to be the time consuming part, and fixing
>>> bugs goes more quickly, so I'd like to see us invest more time as
>>> a team in finding bugs
>>> + if we shake out problems earlier we can make a better
>>> assessment for the schedule, which helps with other planning
>>> decisions
>>>
>>> Morgen, could you elaborate on the consequences of stamping/
>>> sharing not working correctly in the interim? Does it fail
>>> gracefully?
>>
>> At the moment, it's not quite graceful: the sidebar would indicate
>> an error (via the exclamation icon), a stack trace would appear in
>> chandler.log, but each sync of that collection would fail
>> (although other collections would not be affected -- they would
>> continue to sync). I'm currently looking at how to better recover
>> from this state, aside from deleting the local collection and re-
>> subscribing.
>>
>> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>>
>> Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
>> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
More information about the chandler-dev
mailing list