[Chandler-dev] Comments on checkpoint reports requested

[Mike Taylor]

With your most recent change I find the information in the report even 
easier to use and understand.

+1 to the current content and layout

On Jul 10, 2006, at 8:18 PM, Dan Steinicke wrote:

> I have recently gotten some comments about the checkpoint reports and 
> by request this week I have separated out the bugs found during 
> checkpoint testing from the bugs found since the last checkpoint 
> report was produced.
> Also by request I am soliciting comments on the checkpoint reports.  I 
> would welcome any feedback you have to give.  Personally I am 
> interested in the following questions.
>
> Are they useful to you?
>
> What could be changed to make them more useful?
>
> What could be left out that you wouldn't miss?
>
>
>
> Dan
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>
> Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
>
>
---
Bear

Build and Release Engineer
Open Source Applications Foundation (OSAF)
bear at osafoundation.org
http://www.osafoundation.org

bear at code-bear.com
http://code-bear.com

PGP Fingerprint = 9996 719F 973D B11B E111  D770 9331 E822 40B3 CD29


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/chandler-dev/attachments/20060710/175cf58a/PGP.pgp