[Chandler-dev] Week changing performance

[Jeffrey Harris]

Hi Dan,

Many long weeks ago I said:
>> One other thing I realized when testing is that the change in
>> r10945 to generate recurring events in range more efficiently is
>> likely to help rendering of calendars with significant numbers of
>> non-recurring events in the past, without much gain for calendars
>> that have mostly recurring events.  As it happens, our performance
>> tests are using a calendar with 2689 recurring events (times 9
>> occurrences each) and 311 non-recurring events.

Dan said:
> I think you are reversing the count of recurring and non-recurring 
> events. (\chandler\tools\QATestScripts\DataFiles\Generated3000.ics) 
> actually has: 311 recurring events that each recur 9 times giving a
> total occurrence of (311 x 9 = 2799) and 2689 non-recurring events
> 
> just try this as a quick test: grep -c RRULE
> tools/QATestScripts/DataFiles/Generated3000.ics

Right you are!  I don't know how I managed to screw that up, obviously I
grepped for RRULE or I wouldn't have gotten the exact number 311, but
somehow I reversed the numbers.  OK, so I think our test data is fine
then.  Thanks!

Sincerely,
Jeffrey