[Chandler-dev] Re: EggResourceManager ready for review

[Andi Vajda]

On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Brian Kirsch wrote:

> Can you elaborate more, -1 is not very descriptive.

Indeed, it's not. It was getting late here and I was responding to the 
statement saying "However, requiring only ASCII file paths in the egg is 
fine. I think anything beyond that is merely a nice to have feature and not a 
must have feature."

It's not fine and not just a nice to have feature. If this topic is all about 
doing good on the i18n and l10n promises then requiring ASCII paths seems to 
be going against that idea. ASCII-only paths are a US-only feature.

But maybe I misunderstood the context of the conversation and my comment is 
off the mark ?

Andi..