[Chandler-dev] Compiler versions

[Heikki Toivonen]

Andi Vajda wrote:
> My preference is neither. We should document which compilers are known
> to work so that developers who want reliability know what to work with.

I don't see how this could work. Any code change could cause the build
to break under some previously "known to work" compiler.

-- 
  Heikki Toivonen


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 251 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/chandler-dev/attachments/20060419/991cb68a/signature.pgp