[Chandler-dev] The type of ContentItem.body [bug 3531]

[Alec Flett]

Ted Leung wrote:
>
> I propose that we adopt Morgen's proposal (in the bug) that we change 
> the type to schema.Text,
+1

> and that any parcel that needs to augment the body of a content item 
> do it via a plugin specific mixin or annotation.   Do people have 
> thoughts on whether it is better to use a mixin or an annotation?   Is 
> there some other mechanism where we could avoid creating parcel/mixin 
> specific body attributes.
>
> ----
> Ted Leung                 Open Source Applications Foundation (OSAF)
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>
> Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/chandler-dev/attachments/20060411/3d021880/attachment.htm