[Dev] Propose getting rid of developer release
heikki at osafoundation.org
Wed Nov 30 18:29:31 PST 2005
Andi Vajda wrote:
>> We wouldn't have the bug nor this discussion if we could do nothing. It
>> all started because the end-user release did not have all the same tests
>> and tools that you get with dev release or when you build chandler
>> yourself. QA and testers needs them. Parcel developers need them.
> That is a worthwhile conversation to have but I thought you had
> suggested getting rid of the debug bits distribution. What you're
> suggesting above doesn't require us getting rid of the debug bits
I am not suggesting anything above. I am stating a fact.
But as a potential response to the need I suggested getting rid of
dev release (and putting all dev tools into release), and it is one of
the items on the ballot[2,3].
 Describe 4a and 4b:
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 253 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/chandler-dev/attachments/20051130/da018f26/signature.pgp
More information about the Dev