[Dev] Propose getting rid of developer release

[Heikki Toivonen]

Ted Leung wrote:
> Could you then rephrase the ballot in terms of 4a and 4b?

4a) do nothing
4b) some variation of the case where dev is as is and end-user bits
don't contain any tools or tests, but there is some script or some new
way to get the missing tests and tools

I'll say:

4a -1 because we clearly need to do something
4b -1 because I believe one of the requirements is that all of the tests
and tools should in in one downloadable package, in the release, and
that people should test the release and not some other thing

-- 
  Heikki Toivonen

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 253 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/chandler-dev/attachments/20051130/9ccb8a57/signature.pgp