[Dev] Objection to the new CPIA example

[Phillip J. Eby]

At 04:45 PM 11/7/2005 -0800, Katie Capps Parlante wrote:
>Would you feel differently if the annotation and attribute had different 
>names that didn't imply "hint to layer above me", but made it clear that 
>the annotation belonged to the view layer?

Actually, now that you mention it, if we were to do something like 
ViewableKind, it shouldn't go in osaf.pim anyway, but rather be part of the 
detail view parcel(s), since the annotation is on their behalf.  I'm 
guessing John just put it there because of the old ContentKind being there 
before.