[Dev] Parcel namespaces and the schema API

Phillip J. Eby pje at telecommunity.com
Wed May 11 13:41:52 PDT 2005


At 02:16 PM 5/11/2005 -0500, Jeffrey Harris wrote:
>Katie Capps Parlante wrote:
> > Phillip J. Eby wrote:
> >  > Removing <namespace> is of course the potentially controversial bit, so
> >
> >> if you know of any reasons why it should remain, or have any input as
> >> to what the deprecation period before its removal should be, please
> >> respond.  Thanks!
> >
> > If I remember correctly, this was added for the convenience of xslt
> > processing. We were doing this to generate docs a while back, but we
> > haven't been doing that for some time. (Morgen uses the repository
> > directly instead). I'm in favor of removing it. +1
>
>Yup, we're not doing XSLT on parcel.xml anymore, +1 to removing <namespace>.

I've just checked in a change to make <namespace> unnecessary even for root 
parcels, and to remove the known uses of <namespace> in root parcels.




More information about the Dev mailing list