[Dev] logging proposal
hazmat at objectrealms.net
Thu Sep 30 09:33:55 PDT 2004
On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 11:24 -0700, Katie Capps Parlante wrote:
> Hi Kapil,
> I think we are all in agreement that we like your proposal and would
> basically like to go ahead with it.
> We still have to resolve the logging hierarchy. The first step here is
> probably to look at the current parcel hierarchy for where it may need
> to be refactored (we have a few messes to clean up). I think we do want
> the logging hierarchy to reflect the parcel hierarchy, although perhaps
> only the "top level" parcels to avoid a deeply nested logging hierarchy.
> It would be great to do both of these things (rationalization of the
> parcel hierarchy and a logging framework) for our 0.5 release -- its a
> bit late to get new work into the 0.4 release. We're going to be
> spending the next month wrapping up the 0.4 release and planning the 0.5
> release, btw.
> Are you up for implementing your proposal? I'm adding the task of
> rationalizing the parcel hierarchy to my plate, early in the 0.5 cycle.
sure, i'm up for implementation. probably third week of october.
> Kapil Thangavelu wrote:
> > hi folks,
> > i put together a logging proposal, about unifying the logging
> > configuration and usage within chandler,
> > http://wiki.osafoundation.org/bin/view/Chandler/ AlternativeLoggingProposal
> > the structure of the logging hierarchy is a big open question..
> > cheers,
> > Kapil Thangavelu <hazmat at objectrealms.net> Vision Implemented
> > objectrealms.net <http://www.objectrealms.net>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/chandler-dev/attachments/20040930/dc7a34cb/attachment.pgp
More information about the Dev