[Dev] On bug resolutions

[Heikki Toivonen]

I've seen some confusion over bug resolutions, so I thought I'd write 
how I interpret them:

FIXED - The bug was fixed and you can actually point to the checkin or 
other action that fixed it.

WORKSFORME - A miracle happened. It started working, but you can't 
figure out for sure what fixed it.

LATER - Should not be used. Set target milestone "Future" instead. The 
reason is that a bug that is marked LATER is basically never seen again 
and gets lost (the default query values never show it and people never 
remember to query for it).

WONTFIX - There is a reason why this bug is not going to be fixed, and 
why it should never actually be fixed even if somebody else thought it 
might be a good idea. The wontfix reason should clearly state why it 
should never be done. If it is something we won't be doing now, but 
maybe in a year or two, set target milestone "Future".

INVALID - The bug does not make sense, or there was some 
misunderstanding. Either it was invalid already when it was failed, or 
things changed so that it became invalid. An example of the latter 
happening is for example a bug in some 3rd party library which becomes 
invalid if we remove the 3rd party library from the build.

-- 
   Heikki Toivonen


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 249 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/chandler-dev/attachments/20040910/6f479787/signature.pgp