[Dev] Re: refcounted
morgen at osafoundation.org
Mon Oct 25 13:35:01 PDT 2004
I also agree that we should just have the repository default to the new
On Oct 25, 2004, at 6:59 AM, Lisa Dusseault wrote:
> I'm tending to agree with John here. What's the cost to keeping the
> refcounted and non-refcounted modes? Are we going to test both modes?
> apply fixes to both modes? document, etc? Unused code goes stale
> On Oct 24, 2004, at 6:36 PM, John Anderson wrote:
>> I already did that -- that wasn't my point. I was suggesting removing
>> the refcounted kwd since I can't think of any reason you'd want to
>> use the repository non ref counted -- and if you can think of a
>> reason, the kwd should be nonrefcounded so no kwd is ref counted
>> (i.e. a sensable default)
>> Andi Vajda wrote:
>>> You're welcome to turn it on in application/Application.py, line 207.
>>> Same applies to the -exclusive option, line 206, the app needs to
>>> decide what it wants to do there as well.
>>> On Sun, 24 Oct 2004, John Anderson wrote:
>>>> Now that we have the refcounted option in the repository, I'd vote
>>>> for making it the default and eliminating the option of
>>>> non-refcounting altogether -- unless you can think of any advantage
>>>> of non-refcounting.
>> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>> Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
> Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
More information about the Dev