[Dev] Proposing the removal of Item.__iter__( )
vajda at osafoundation.org
Mon Oct 25 13:27:41 PDT 2004
Yes, I agree, this would resolve the confusion. We're not emphasizing the use
of parent/children containers anyway.
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004, Morgen Sagen wrote:
> This is an old outstanding issue I would like to resolve:
> One way to get an item's children was to iterate on the item ("for child in
> item:"), but now that ItemCollection overrides __iter__( ), that changes the
> behavior. Iterating on an ItemCollection returns results rather than
> Unless there are any objections, I would like to have Andi remove Item's
> __iter__( ) method and just have people use iterChildren( ) instead.
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
> Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
More information about the Dev