[Dev] Feedback on repository documents requested

[Mike Taylor]

First of all let me say thanks for updating the documentation!

I've just done a first pass thru so I don't have any detail notes but I  
will be making another pass tonight or tomorrow.  I did have one  
question about the mentioning of repository paths (i.e. //path/to/item)  
- is that still "allowed" or is it being deprecated?

again, thanks for the doc updates.

---
Bear
http://code-bear.com
PGP Fingerprint = 9996 719F 973D B11B E111  D770 9331 E822 40B3 CD29


On Oct 12, 2004, at 8:39 PM, Ted Leung wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I checked in a pair of documents for repository features in 0.4.  I'd  
> appreciate any comments, corrections, or questions regarding their  
> contents.
>
> <http://cvs.osafoundation.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/chandler/distrib/ 
> docs/repository-intro.html?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/html>
>
> <http://cvs.osafoundation.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/chandler/distrib/ 
> docs/chandler-query-system.html?rev=HEAD&content-type=text/html>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ted
>
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
>
> Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
> http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: PGP.sig
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 186 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/chandler-dev/attachments/20041013/b5f2c392/PGP.pgp