[Dev] Build: generated code

Ted Leung twl at osafoundation.org
Tue May 18 10:26:54 PDT 2004

That's fine by me.  I prefer that we not check generated artifacts into 
source control.


On May 18, 2004, at 10:14 AM, Mark Jaffe wrote:

> After considering this issue from several viewpoints, it seems to me 
> that this really does belong in the repository portion of the tree, 
> and we should have (and it will be documented) the requirement that 
> any portion of the "chandler" tree remain "non-compiled". This 
> obligates the maintainer of this portion of the code to be responsible 
> for generating the resulting *.py files, with full disclosure of the 
> method of regenerating from the source *.g (which should also be 
> checked in!)

More information about the Dev mailing list