[Dev] Build: generated code
Ted Leung
twl at osafoundation.org
Tue May 18 10:26:54 PDT 2004
That's fine by me. I prefer that we not check generated artifacts into
source control.
Ted
On May 18, 2004, at 10:14 AM, Mark Jaffe wrote:
>
> After considering this issue from several viewpoints, it seems to me
> that this really does belong in the repository portion of the tree,
> and we should have (and it will be documented) the requirement that
> any portion of the "chandler" tree remain "non-compiled". This
> obligates the maintainer of this portion of the code to be responsible
> for generating the resulting *.py files, with full disclosure of the
> method of regenerating from the source *.g (which should also be
> checked in!)
>
More information about the Dev
mailing list