[Dev] Re: Chandler's version of Python
d.l.dwiggins at computer.org
Fri Feb 6 19:09:54 PST 2004
Morgen Sagen writes:
> Off the top of my head, I know that for Python I snipped out the code on
> Windows that checks the system registry for the location of installed python
> extensions because they were getting loaded instead of the ones we were
> providing. I'll have to check CVS to see if there are other diffs. For
> wxWindows I think we have some changes that allow it to compile under
> VisualStudio7.1, but again I'll have to check CVS.
Thanks for the feedback and the effort. My main concern is as a user of
this Python -- is there anything I should be careful of when writing code?
For example, it looks like it's a 2.3 release; can I rely on the standard
2.3 documentation (I have ActiveState 2.3.2 installed)? And a similar
concern for wxPython; I currently have 126.96.36.199 installed on my Win2K
machine. I'd like, for instance, to be able to create site-package modules
that I can put in both the "stand-alone" and the Chandler versions.
More information about the Dev