[Dev] Source Code Revision Control Infrastructure

[Florin Iucha]

On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 11:15:57PM -0800, Michael R. Bernstein wrote:
> I am cross-posting this to the 'dev' and 'process' lists at Mitch's
> suggestion. It was part of a longer summary of the types of
> infrastructure both the community and OSAF core developers need.
> 
> Mitch also confirmed that the OSAF currently intended to use CVS.
> 
> 
> Source Code Revision Control 
> ---------------------------- 
> 
> I'll let others more qualified than myself discuss their relative
> merits, but there seem to be three contenders for this piece of
> infrastructure: 
> 
> * CVS - http://www.cvshome.org/
> 
> * Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/

There isn't much to think when choosing between those two: Subversion is 
developed by the same guys who are maintaining CVS. Subversion is
self-hosting for over a year now without any problems and it is rapidly 
approaching 1.0 .

> * arch - http://www.fifthvision.net/open/bin/view/Arch/WebHome

I don't follow arch too closely but by comparing the mailing list
archives traffic, the subversion community is bigger and the developers
are more active.

Just my $.02,
florn

-- 

"If it's not broken, let's fix it till it is."

41A9 2BDE 8E11 F1C5 87A6  03EE 34B3 E075 3B90 DFE4
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.osafoundation.org/pipermail/chandler-dev/attachments/20021110/94c03e88/attachment.pgp