other formats (Re: [Dev] 4Suite RDF and ZOD)
adam at devtty.net
Fri Nov 8 14:00:53 PST 2002
Would you guys consider releasing some source for the data layers sooner
rather than later?
I'm very interested in the approach you're taking and would love to
tinker with it, even if it all changes out from under me in two weeks ;
Just releasing the data layers shouldn't cause any too early support
issues. There would be a high barrier to entry so you shouldn't have to
answer tooo many dumb questions...
adam at devtty.net
On Fri, 2002-11-08 at 11:22, John Anderson wrote:
> I hope to have more time to elaborate, but this is the approach I am
> proposing. RDF (flexible data structures, pervasive URIs, fully
> -extendible). Make the RDF look like normal Python objects that
> transparently persist. I want it to be really easy for programmers to
> manipulate the data in ways they are familiar. I hope the turnaround for
> modifying the schema and manaipulating it in Python should be measured
> in seconds, not minutes.
> Aaron Swartz wrote:
> > Hi, David! I haven't caught up on the mailing list yet, so apologies
> > if I'm repeating what's been said.
> > On Saturday, November 2, 2002, at 02:48 PM, David McCusker wrote:
> >> The phrase "RDF-based PIM" makes it sound like RDF is somehow
> >> pervasive in the architecture so it cannot be replaced with something
> >> else. [...] Other ways of writing content persistently might join
> >> Morgan's RDF prototype.
> > I understood this to mean that they were adopting the RDF philosophy
> > (flexible data structures, pervasive URIs, fully-extendible
> > descriptions of everything); I certainly hope they aren't planning to
> > store it as RDF/XML.
> > RDF is sort of a natural way to think of this data, but that doesn't
> > mean the APIs need look like addTriple, getTriples (indeed, my TRAMP
> > library for Python makes RDF look like regular objects) nor that
> > the storage format encode things in RDF. There are many APIs and
> > backends that can be used without sacrificing the flexibility of the
> > philosophy.
> >  http://www.aaronsw.com/2002/tramp
> > The important features to me are that everything is intertwingled,
> > with links from mail to address book to recent messages to calendar
> > appoints everywhere, and that I can always add more attributes and
> > values to nodes. In this sense, the RDF philosophy is that we make
> > simple statements (this email is about the Chandler project; this
> > folder should show all messages about the Chandler project) rather
> > than placing things in some sort of hierarchy (new folder with name
> > Chandler; move this email to the Chandler folder).
> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
> Open Source Applications Foundation "Dev" mailing list
More information about the Dev